deebeedee

In what I think is a response to the brouhaha over Sharon Stone’s calling the recent China quake “bad karma,” Yahoo! today links on its homepage the HowStuffWorks article, “How Karma Works.”

I post here an excerpt from a 2005 interview with another celebrity, Bono, highlighting the difference between Karma and Grace:

Assayas: I think I am beginning to understand religion because I have started acting and thinking like a father. What do you make of that?

Bono: Yes, I think that’s normal. It’s a mind-blowing concept that the God who created the universe might be looking for company, a real relationship with people, but the thing that keeps me on my knees is the difference between Grace and Karma.

Assayas: I haven’t heard you talk about that.

Bono: I really believe we’ve moved out of the realm of Karma into one of Grace.

Assayas: Well, that doesn’t make it clearer for me.

Bono: You see, at the center of all religions is the idea of Karma. You know, what you put out comes back to you: an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, or in physics—in physical laws—every action is met by an equal or an opposite one. It’s clear to me that Karma is at the very heart of the universe. I’m absolutely sure of it. And yet, along comes this idea called Grace to upend all that “as you reap, so you will sow” stuff. Grace defies reason and logic. Love interrupts, if you like, the consequences of your actions, which in my case is very good news indeed, because I’ve done a lot of stupid stuff.

Assayas: I’d be interested to hear that.

Bono: That’s between me and God. But I’d be in big trouble if Karma was going to finally be my judge. I’d be in deep s—. It doesn’t excuse my mistakes, but I’m holding out for Grace. I’m holding out that Jesus took my sins onto the Cross, because I know who I am, and I hope I don’t have to depend on my own religiosity.

Assayas: The Son of God who takes away the sins of the world. I wish I could believe in that.

Bono: But I love the idea of the Sacrificial Lamb. I love the idea that God says: Look, you cretins, there are certain results to the way we are, to selfishness, and there’s a mortality as part of your very sinful nature, and, let’s face it, you’re not living a very good life, are you? There are consequences to actions. The point of the death of Christ is that Christ took on the sins of the world, so that what we put out did not come back to us, and that our sinful nature does not reap the obvious death. That’s the point. It should keep us humbled… . It’s not our own good works that get us through the gates of heaven.

• iBackpack - Backpack Pages Optimized for the iPhone and iPod Touch
• Worship, Not Evangelism, The Most Important Task The quote here from Robert Reymond, although tending to paint a broad brush on evangelicalism, points out the primacy of worship over evangelism as the reason for going to church (a counterpoint to Christianity Today’s “What Evangelism Isn’t” perhaps).
• Should They Accept Christ as Personal Savior? “The sinner in his natural state has no power in himself to accept Christ as his personal Savior… nor has he any real desire or intention of doing so for the reason that, as stated above, his “carnal mind” is “enmity against God”"

From Confessions of a Bog-Standard Evangelical:

I am not in the game of bashing evangelicals and evangelicalism – humanly speaking, I owe everything, almost all my theology, and much of my Christian nurture to such people. It wasn’t the confessional Presbyterians who told me the gospel; it wasn’t the confessional Lutherans who took the time to teach me the basics of the faith; it was the evangelicals. They cared enough to reach out to me and engage me. Yet evangelicalism at an institutional level seems to have been hijacked, not by the kind of decent, orthodox people who taught me the faith, but by a group of people who are happy to use the institutions and the market of evangelicalism to give themselves a power base, but who seem to despise precisely the kind of basic evangelicalism which I have loved and to which I owe so much.

I’ve been increasingly coming across sentiments such as the one quoted above. The church I attend falls under the evangelical umbrella (does being a non-denominational church automatically make it evangelical?). Although I’m not sure what “institutional level” means since evangelicalism is such a nebulous group, I do agree that there are some elements that have entered the fold and smuggled in ideas that are far from the heart of the gospel.

• The Irresistible Urge to Destroy New York on Screen - New York Times Blog
• A Little Leaven - A Museum of Idolatry “…What Happens When the Church Fails to Remain Faithful to the Correct Preaching and Teaching of God’s Word”
• What Evangelism Isn’t | Christianity Today We need to stop mistaking other Christian activities for the spreading of the gospel.

• Stand to Reason on YouTube STR.org videos featuring Greg Koukl is now on YouTube
• Usability.gov Your guide for developing usable & useful Web sites
• The Golden Compass Controversy “…it is generally unwise to criticize a movie until you’ve actually had the chance to see it. In this case the concerns are understandable in light of Pullman’s statements that he wrote in His Dark Materials trilogy… to promote his atheistic views.”
• Nehemiah’s wall uncovered | Jerusalem Post