Comments on: I, Daughter http://www.deebeedee.com/blog/2004/07/26/i-daughter/ "Where The Off-Topic Finds Its Home" Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:36:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Marc http://www.deebeedee.com/blog/2004/07/26/i-daughter/#comment-441 Marc Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.deebeedee.com/weblog/?p=294#comment-441 I have not seen the movie yet, but most fans and critics did mention that the movie departs from Asimov's Law of Robotics: 1. A robot may not harm a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by the human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law But, if his daughter likes it, may he'll like it too. Um her daughter is a tad cute, but does not really resemble Asimov. Maybe she's a robot. I have not seen the movie yet, but most fans and critics did mention that the movie departs from Asimov’s Law of Robotics:

1. A robot may not harm a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by the human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

3. A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law

But, if his daughter likes it, may he’ll like it too. Um her daughter is a tad cute, but does not really resemble Asimov. Maybe she’s a robot.

]]> By: daniel http://www.deebeedee.com/blog/2004/07/26/i-daughter/#comment-442 daniel Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.deebeedee.com/weblog/?p=294#comment-442 > Maybe she's a robot Maybe. She wasn't named ROByn for nothing. :) Hey Marc, what happened to your site?? > Maybe she’s a robot

Maybe. She wasn’t named ROByn for nothing. :)
Hey Marc, what happened to your site??

]]>